History
  • No items yet
midpage
George Delaney v. Brandon Mullen
704 F. App'x 290
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Frederick Delaney, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

George Frederick Delaney seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action against some, but not all, Defendants. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Delaney seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case Details

Case Name: George Delaney v. Brandon Mullen
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 28, 2017
Citation: 704 F. App'x 290
Docket Number: 17-7178
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.