History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gentry v. State
105 Tex. Crim. 96
Tex. Crim. App.
1926
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Conviction in District Court of Hopkins County of unlawfully transporting intoxicating liquor, punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

Appellant pleaded guilty. In such cases the statute requires that evidence shall be introduced. While there is no statement of facts in the case, we must presume the regularity of the procedure in the absence of a showing to the contrary. The only complaint is of argument of the District Attorney. Nothing in the bill of exceptions makes evident to us the fact that there was no testimony before the court to which the argument could be related. In the absence of some such showing in the bill we are compelled to accord to the action of the learned trial court regularity, and that in his opinion the argument was pertinent and proper and called for by the evidence.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.






Addendum

Appellant earnestly insists that we erred in refusing to consider a bill of exceptions appearing in the record, which he claims manifests error even in the absence of a statement of facts. Inspection of said bill, which appears to be the only one in the record, shows that the court refused to approve said bill. We are not at liberty to consider the proposition urged by appellant, when presented in a bill under these circumstances.

The motion for rehearing will be overruled.

Overruled. *Page 98

Case Details

Case Name: Gentry v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Mar 17, 1926
Citation: 105 Tex. Crim. 96
Docket Number: No. 10001.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.