Genay v. Norris
1 S.C.L. 6 | Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas | 1784
in charging the jury, told them, that this was a very wanton outrage upon a stranger in the country. That notwithstanding it was called a frolic, yet the proceedings appeared to be the result of a combination, which wrought a very serious injury to the plaintiff, and such a one as entitled him to very exemplary damages, especially from a professional character, who could not plead ignorance of the operation and powerful effects of this medicine.
Verdict for plaintiff, 400/. damages.
