History
  • No items yet
midpage
Genay v. Norris
1 S.C.L. 6
Pennsylvania Court of Common P...
1784
Check Treatment
The Court,

in charging the jury, told them, that this was a very wanton outrage upon a stranger in the country. That notwithstanding it was called a frolic, yet the proceedings appeared to be the result of a combination, which wrought a very serious injury to the plaintiff, and such a one as entitled him to very exemplary damages, especially from a professional character, who could not plead ignorance of the operation and powerful effects of this medicine.

Verdict for plaintiff, 400/. damages.

Case Details

Case Name: Genay v. Norris
Court Name: Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas
Date Published: Jan 15, 1784
Citation: 1 S.C.L. 6
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.