History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gemmell v. Collins
210 P. 738
Idaho
1922
Check Treatment
LEE, J.

This is a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s appeal for the reason that the transcript of record on appeal in said cause has not been filed within the time prescribed by Rule 26 or any extension of time as prescribed by Rule 28 (176 Pac. xix) of this court!

The motion is based upon a certificate of the clerk of the district court of the fifth district, for Bannock county, wherein such clerk certifies that a money judgment was obtained against the plaintiff and appellant in the sum of *417$525 on the 9th day of December, 1921; that a notice and an undertaking on appeal were filed in said cause on March 4, 1922; and that the reporter’s transcript was settled on the 9th day of September, 1922.

Acknowledgment of service of this certificate of the clerk was made by C. M. Booth, Esq., counsel for appellant, on November 10, 1922, and no counter showing has been made.

No transcript on appeal has been filed in this court within ninety days, as required by said Rule 26; nor has there been any extension of time by the court or any justice thereof, and the time limit having expired, under Rule 27 (176 Pac. xix), the appeal will be dismissed, with costs to respondent.

Rice, C. J., and Budge, McCarthy and Dunn, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Gemmell v. Collins
Court Name: Idaho Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 19, 1922
Citation: 210 P. 738
Court Abbreviation: Idaho
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.