Gelpcke v. . Quentell
74 N.Y. 599
NY
1878
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 601

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 602 RAPALLO, J., reads for reversal and new trial.

ANDREWS and MILLER, JJ., concur.

EARL, J., concurs on ground that question of fact should have been submitted to the jury.

CHURCH, Ch. J., and FOLGER, J., dissent.

Judgment reversed.





Lead Opinion

Rapallo, J.,

reads for reversal and new trial.

Andrews and Miller, JJ., concur.





Concurrence Opinion

Earl, J.,

concurs on ground that question of fact should have been submitted to the jury.

Church, Ch. J., and Folger, J., dissent.

Judgment reversed.