Geisler v. State209 So. 2d 474 Fla. Dist. Ct. App.1968Check Treatment PER CURIAM. Affirmed upon authority of Peel v. State, Fla.App.1963, 154 So.2d 910; Rogers v. State, 1947, 158 Fla. 582, 790, 30 So.2d 625; Jarrell v. State, 1939, 135 Fla. 736, 185 So. 873; Craig v. State, 1928, 95 Fla. 374, 116 So. 272, and Braxton v. State, 1938, 132 Fla. 815, 182 So. 276. LILES, C. J., and ALLEN and PIERCE, JJ., concur.
