History
  • No items yet
midpage
Geisel v. Regina Co.
97 N.J.L. 331
N.J.
1922
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenehard in the Supreme Court.

*332For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Black, Katzenbach, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Geisel v. Regina Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Feb 9, 1922
Citation: 97 N.J.L. 331
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.