History
  • No items yet
midpage
62 Ohio St. 3d 35
Ohio
1991
Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Thus, we hereby publicly reprimand respondent for having violated DR 4-101(B)(2), 4-101(B)(3) and 5-105(A). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Geauga County Bar Ass'n v. Psenicka
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 9, 1991
Citations: 62 Ohio St. 3d 35; 577 N.E.2d 1074; 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2276; No. 91-857
Docket Number: No. 91-857
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Geauga County Bar Ass'n v. Psenicka, 62 Ohio St. 3d 35