The appeal here present is from a second trial'of the issues involved in
Gazzam v. Building Service Employees International Union, Local 262,
29 Wn. (2d) 488,
The members of this court have been unable to agree. Four judges were of the view that the judgment should be modified to the extent of allowing appellant Gazzam recovery of damages occasioned by picketing and by being placed on the unfair fist. Three judges were of the opinion that recovery should only be allowed for damages occasioned by the picketing, and two judges were of the opinion that no damages should be allowed either for picketing or placing on the unfair list.
Inasmuch as a majority of the court has not reached a definite decision, the judgment of the trial court will stand affirmed.
