History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gazda v. Kolinski
64 N.Y.2d 1100
NY
1985
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

Appeal insofar as it seeks review of that portion of the prior order of the Appellate Division which enjoined expansion pending the accounting dismissed for mootness; order appealed from and order brought up for review otherwise affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in so much of the memorandum at the Appellate Division as pertains to management fees and punitive damages (91 AD2d 860).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Kaye, Alexander and Kane.* Taking no part: Judge Simons.

Designated pursuant to NY Constitution, article VI, § 2.

Case Details

Case Name: Gazda v. Kolinski
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 25, 1985
Citation: 64 N.Y.2d 1100
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.