History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gayle v. Randle
4 Port. 232
Ala.
1836
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

— The judgments in this cases must be affirmed. The demurrer to the second plea was properly sustained.

When special pleas are agreed to be taken in *233short, by consent of counsel, it can only be understood by the Court, that matters of formare waived, —they must contain substance, or that which, if admitted, will make out a case for the party pleading.

By reference to. the case in 1 Stewart, 11, relied on by the plaintiff in error, it will be seen, that the plea does not state facts sufficient, under that decision, to make out a defence. It does not state, that the means of recovering the debt, have been lost by the negligence of the plaintiff; neither do.es if state? that the notice was in writing.-

Case Details

Case Name: Gayle v. Randle
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jun 15, 1836
Citation: 4 Port. 232
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.