History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gay v. Mooney
67 N.J.L. 687
N.J.
1902
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court in this cause is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice-Dixon in that court, reported ante p. 22.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Van Syckel, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom. 13.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Gay v. Mooney
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jun 16, 1902
Citation: 67 N.J.L. 687
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.