Gay v. Gay
108 Ga. 739 | Ga. | 1899
1. It appearing that the question made in the cross-bill of exceptions is controlling upon the case as a whole, it has been first considered ; and inasmuch as the judgment therein is reversed, there is no occasion for determining the errors alleged in the main bill of exceptions. Cheshire v. Williams, 101 Ga. 814; Jordan v. Ga. So. Ry. Co., 105 Ga. 274; Hollis v. Lawton, 107 Ga. 105.
2. Upon the line of construction indicated by this court in White v. Hopkins, 80 Ga. 154, which has since been followed in Goff v. Davenport, 96 Ga. 423, and Guthrie v. Guthrie, 105 Ga. 86, the instrument under consideration in the present case was a deed and not a will. See Barnes v. Stephens, 107 Ga. 442.
Judgment reversed, on eross-bill of exceptions.