Gathers v. ArtusGathers v. Artus
Petitioner, an inmate, commenced this
Initially, with respect to the July 2007 determination, petitioner‘s challenge thereto is untimely given that he failed to commence this proceeding until after the applicable four-month statute of limitations had expired (see
Rose, J.P., Lahtinen, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and Stein, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the July 2007 and September 2007 determinations are confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed to that extent. Adjudged that the petition, to the extent that it challenges the October 2007 determination, is dismissed, as moot, without costs.