557 P.2d 154 | Utah | 1976
Prior to June 29, 1973, plaintiffs, Joseph S. Gasser, Jr., and Freda N. Gasser, owned
It was further agreed by the parties that the deed from Gasser to Horne would be held by Backman, Backman and Clark for a period of thirty days so that in the event the lending institution was able to sell 90% of the loan to an Oregon finance company without the requirement of the personal guaranty of the defendants, then plaintiff would be relieved of the obligation to convey an undivided one-half interest in the property to the Hornes. The parties also stipulated that any defaulting party would pay all costs and damages, including reasonable attorney fees.
Thereafter, plaintiffs and defendants executed the note and mortgage. American Savings & Loan advanced to plaintiff $1,050,000 which was used to acquire 100% interest in the property, and plaintiffs received, for their own use and benefit, the remaining balance of $94,050.13. Subsequent to the above transactions, American Savings & Loan Association was unable to obtain the refinancing of the loan through the Oregon finance company.
At the end of the 30-day period, plaintiffs brought this suit to prevent recordation of the trust deed and note which defendants had co-signed with the Gassers and also to prevent the recordation or delivery of the deed from Gassers to Horne of a 50% interest in the property.
The trial court rendered judgment in defendants’ favor, including costs and damages, whereupon plaintiffs made this appeal.
We affirm.
Appellants argue that the Horne agreement is void for lack of consideration. This Court expounded the general rule in Manwill v. Oyler
There is little question that both exist in this case. Appellants received a loan which they could not have had without the Hornes signing with them. They also increased their ownership in the trailer park from 42.5% to 50% and received $94,050.13 in cash for their own personal use — benefits to the promissors. On June 29, 1973, respondents agreed to become personally liable for $1,050,000 — a detriment.
Appellants raise two other arguments. First, that the Horne agreement is void as having been executed by the Gas-sers under duress. We summarily dismiss that point as being inconsistent with the record. Second, that the court erred in not granting appellants a jury trial. We quickly dispose of that argument because
In affirming the judgment of the trial court, we award costs of this appeal to respondents.
. 11 Utah 2d 433, 361 P.2d 177 (1961).
. Western Federal Savings and Loan Association of Denver v. National Homes Corporation, 167 Colo. 93, 445 P.2d 892 (1968).