History
  • No items yet
midpage
Garson v. Rapping
66 N.Y.2d 928
NY
1985
Check Treatment

*931OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (105 AD2d 726). We add only that the cpurt properly applied the limited exception to the rule of strict compliance with the requirements of the Business Corporation Law (see, e.g., Matter of Rye Psychiatric Hosp. Center, 66 NY2d 333) recognized in Zion v Kurtz (50 NY2d 92, 102, rearg denied 50 NY2d 1060).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander. Taking no part: Judge Titone.

Case Details

Case Name: Garson v. Rapping
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 17, 1985
Citation: 66 N.Y.2d 928
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.