History
  • No items yet
midpage
Garrett v. Booth
140 Ga. App. 176
Ga. Ct. App.
1976
Check Treatment
Bell, Chief Judge.

The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff in this suit on an oral contract and a judgment was entered accordingly. The single enumeration of error concerns the correctness of the trial court’s ruling in not admitting the testimony of defendánt as to statements made by a third party concerning the oral contract. There was no error. In order to gain admission of these declarations, defendant had to *177show that the third party was plaintiffs agent at the time. Colt Co. v. Wheeler, 31 Ga. App. 427 (5) (120 SE 792). There was no evidence that the declarant was plaintiffs agent.

Submitted September 20, 1976 Decided October 25, 1976. Reinhardt, Whitley & Sims, GlenWhitley, for appellant. Short & Fowler, Larkin M. Fowler, Jr., Crosby & Hege, David Roy Hege, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Clark and Stolz, JJ., concur.

In recognition of the author having committed the appellate juridical sin of deciding a case according to the heart rather than the mind.

Case Details

Case Name: Garrett v. Booth
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Oct 25, 1976
Citation: 140 Ga. App. 176
Docket Number: 52562
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.