History
  • No items yet
midpage
Garr v. Redman
6 Cal. 574
Cal.
1856
Check Treatment
The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt.

Mr. Chief Justice Murray and Mr. Justice Terry concurred.

The Court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the bill of complaint.

It was properly filed for an account, whether the parties were technically partners or not. The character of the contract set out in the bill made an account necessary to determine their respective rights.

Nor is there any misjoinder of causes of action. The claim which, it is urged, is single against one of the defendants, forms part of the same subject matter, arising as it does out of the joint contract.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Garr v. Redman
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1856
Citation: 6 Cal. 574
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.