History
  • No items yet
midpage
Garofalo v. Sidote
267 A.D. 960
N.Y. App. Div.
1944
Check Treatment

Order denying appellant’s application to place this action on the Military Suspense Calendar, and setting the ease down for trial on a day certain, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs. The appellant, one of two defendants in this negligence action, is now overseas in the military service of the United States. Absence from a trial in which Ms liabilities are being adjudged is prima facie prejudicial. (Boone v. Lightner, 319 U. S. 561, 575.) This prejudice is not overcome by the plaintiff’s consent to the reading of the testimony given by the appellant in a prior action in which the liability of the respective defendants in this action as between themselves was litigated. The plaintiff was not a party to that action and the issues here involved are not necessarily the same. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 992.]

Case Details

Case Name: Garofalo v. Sidote
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 11, 1944
Citation: 267 A.D. 960
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.