History
  • No items yet
midpage
Garner v. Floyd County
24 Ga. App. 693
Ga. Ct. App.
1920
Check Treatment
Broyles, C. J.

The plaintiff in this case was employed as a “concrete foreman” on behalf of Eloyd County by the superintendent of public works, who had general written authority, duly entered upon the minutes, from the board of roads and revenues of the county to employ men for the building and repairing of the public roads and bridges of the county. The plaintiff, to meet a demurrer interposed by the county, amended his original petition by alleging “that the contract of employment therein set forth was entered upon the minutes of the commissioners of roads and revenues of said county.” Upon the trial of the case it appeared that the specific contract with the plaintiff was not in writing and had never been entered upon the minutes of the board of roads and revenues of Eloyd County. Under the ruling stated in the headnote, and the authorities there cited, the court, sitting by consent without the intervention of a jury, did not err in rendering judgment in favor of the defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodivorth, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Garner v. Floyd County
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jan 27, 1920
Citation: 24 Ga. App. 693
Docket Number: 10960
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.