History
  • No items yet
midpage
Garland v. Chattle
12 Johns. 430
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1815
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The variance between the declaration and the writ, should have been taken advantage of in the proper time; but after plea pleaded by the defendant, Chattle, it is too late for him to make the objection. The writ was issued within the six years, and the declaration is to be considered as a continuance of the same suit, so that the statute was no bar. The motion: must be denied.

Motion denied*

Case Details

Case Name: Garland v. Chattle
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1815
Citation: 12 Johns. 430
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.