52 Tenn. 256 | Tenn. | 1871
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The words — “For value received, I assign, transfer,
By the assignments he constitutes himself trustee for the assignees, the assignees having the right to control their respective interests; and if it shall turn out that one may desire the collection by law of the note, and the other should not, the first may resort to a Court of Equity for the enforcement of his rights acquired by the assignment.
The debtor could not be subjected to various suits at the instance of the several assignees; and if suit is brought at law, it must be on the entire instrument, and in the case at bar that would be on the note.
The maxim that choses in action can not be divided or “split up” — that a debtor cannot, without a new contract and his express agreement, become a debtor of more than one, is applicable alone to Courts of Law, and is not meant to interfere with Courts of Chancery in the exercise of their general and peculiar jurisdiction in matters of trust and equitable assignment.
Affirm the decree. The costs of the suit at law will be paid by Smith & Hurt and R. B. Hurt, the other costs will be paid by the attaching creditors.