History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gardner v. Gardner
177 Pa. 218
Pa.
1896
Check Treatment
Pee Curiam,

We find nothing in this record that would justify us in sustaining either of the assignments of error; nor, do we think that any of the questions therein presented require special notice. The case was carefully tried and fairly submitted to the jury, and their verdict in favor of the plaintiffs should not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Gardner v. Gardner
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 5, 1896
Citation: 177 Pa. 218
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 237
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.