Case Information
*1 Case 6:16-cv-00684-CEM-DCI Document 24 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID 1280
U NITED S TATES D ISTRICT C OURT M IDDLE D ISTRICT O F F LORIDA O RLANDO D IVISION BRIAN CHRISTOPHER GARDNER, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:16-cv-684-Orl-41DCI COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant. R EPORT AND R ECOMMENDATION
This cause comes before the Court for consideration without oral argument on the following motion: MOTION: UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WITH REMAND (Doc. 23) FILED: December 9, 2016 THEREON it is RECOMMENDED that the motion be GRANTED . On December 9, 2016, the Commissioner of Social Security (the Commissioner) filed an
Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (the Motion). Doc. 23. In the Motion, the Commissioner requested that her decision be reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) so that the following may occur:
On remand, the Administrative Law Judge will weigh the treatment records and opinions of Dr. Kasia Osadzinska (Central Florida Pain Management Centers), Dr. Ronald Snyder, Dr. Jeffrey Corak, and Dr. Scott Katzman and Dr. Monica McPhail- Pruitt (Advanced Orthopedics and Pain Management) and explain the weight given to the opinion evidence.
*2 Case 6:16-cv-00684-CEM-DCI Document 24 Filed 12/09/16 Page 2 of 2 PageID 1281 Id . at 1. The Motion is unopposed. Id . Upon review of the reasons for reversal and remand of the Commissioner’s decision, the undersigned finds the Motion well-taken.
Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that: 1. The Motion (Doc. 23) be GRANTED ; 2. For the above stated reasons, the final decision of the Commissioner be REVERSED
and REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of Section 405(g); and
3. The Clerk be directed to enter a separate judgment in favor of Plaintiff and to close the case.
NOTICE
TO PARTIES A party has fourteen days from this date to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation’s factual findings and legal conclusions. A party’s failure to file written objections waives that party’s right to challenge on appeal any unobjected-to factual finding or legal conclusion the district judge adopts from the Report and Recommendation. See 11th Cir. R. 3-1. If the parties have no objection to this Report and Recommendation, they may promptly file a joint notice of no objection in order to expedite the final disposition of this case.
Recommended in Orlando, Florida on December 9, 2016. Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties
- 2 -