History
  • No items yet
midpage
Garcia v. State
666 So. 2d 245
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1996
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Michael A. Garcia appeals the denial of his motion for jail credit time pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Garcia raised two grounds for relief. We find no merit to the denial of his second ground and affirm without discussion.

As his first ground, Garcia alleged in his motion that he was entitled to an additional fifty-six days of jail credit against his sentence in case no. 93-11890. The trial court denied relief and attached the written judgment and sentences for this case as well as a transcript of the sentencing hearing. The written judgment and sentences, however, conflict with the oral pronouncements in the transcript. Thus, the amount of credit awarded on the judgments is called into question.

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order denying Garcia’s motion for credit. On remand, the trial court shall correct the written judgment and sentences to conform to the oral pronouncements, then determine the proper amount of credit.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

BLUE, A.C.J., and QUINCE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Garcia v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jan 10, 1996
Citation: 666 So. 2d 245
Docket Number: No. 95-04529
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.