7 Div. 860. | Ala. Ct. App. | Nov 19, 1946

Appellant was charged with driving a motor vehicle on a highway of the State while intoxicated. The prosecution originated in the county court. Upon conviction there, appellant appealed to the circuit court.

The record discloses neither a statement of the case by the solicitor nor a waiver of same by the defendant below. That this mandatory requirement was not complied with is made certain by the clerk's response to the writ of certiorari issued by this court on petition of the Attorney General. The clerk certified "that no Solicitor's Complaint was filed and no waiver of the filing of said Complaint by the Appellant on file."

In the absence of a complaint, or a waiver thereto, the circuit court was without jurisdiction to proceed with the trial. The judgment below must, therefore, be reversed and the cause remanded. Title 15, Sec. 363, Code 1940; Stewart v. State, 26 Ala. App. 78" date_filed="1934-03-06" court="Ala. Ct. App." case_name="Stewart v. State">26 Ala. App. 78, 153 So. 296" date_filed="1934-03-06" court="Ala. Ct. App." case_name="Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Lantrip">153 So. 296; Bonds v. State,28 Ala. App. 194" date_filed="1938-04-19" court="Ala. Ct. App." case_name="Bonds v. State">28 Ala. App. 194, 180 So. 735" date_filed="1938-04-19" court="Ala. Ct. App." case_name="Bonds v. State">180 So. 735; Hagamaker v. State, 21 Ala. App. 345" date_filed="1926-04-13" court="Ala. Ct. App." case_name="McConnico v. State">21 Ala. App. 345,108 So. 262" date_filed="1926-04-13" court="Ala. Ct. App." case_name="Kirkland v. State">108 So. 262.

Reversed and remanded.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.