Gamble v. StateGamble v. State
Daniel Gamble pled nolo contendere to armed trafficking in cocaine1, carrying a concealed firearm2, and aggravated fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer.3 He appeals his sentence arguing the trial court erred in ranking his conviction for armed trafficking in cocaine as a level ten offense. Mr. Gamble‘s armed trafficking conviction should have been ranked as a level seven offense and therefore we vacate his sentence and remand this matter for resentencing.
At sentencing, the trial court scored Mr. Gamble‘s conviction as a level ten offense, holding that
Mr. Gamble committed his crimes on December 27, 1994. Subsequent to this date, our legislature and our supreme court both addressed the issue raised here by Mr. Gamble. First, effective October 1, 1995,
For purposes of sentencing under chapter 921 and determining incentive gain-time eligibility under chapter 944, a felony offense which is reclassified under this section is ranked one level above the ranking under s. 921.0012 or s. 921.0013 of the felony offense committed.
Although Mr. Gamble committed this crime prior to the enactment of the amendments to
JUDGMENTS AFFIRMED; SENTENCES VACATED; and CAUSE REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.
DAUKSCH and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.