Galvis Mujica v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.Galvis Mujica v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.
Manuel F. Cachn, Daniel P. Collins, Daniel L. Geyser, and John W. Spiegel, Munger, Tolles & Olson, Los Angeles, CA; Kristin Linsley Myles, Munger, Tolles & Olson, San Francisco, CA, for defendant/appellee/cross-appellant Occidental Petroleum Corporation.
Kenneth J. Berke, Berke & Kent, Calabasas, CA; Sara M. Fotopulos and Thomas E. Fotopulos, Fotopulos & Fotopulos, Riverview, FL, for defendant/appellee/cross-appellant Airscan, Inc.
Marco B. Simons and Richard L. Herz, Earthrights International, Washington, D.C., for the amicus Earthrights International.
Ralph G. Steinhardt, George Washington University School of Law, Washington, D.C., for the amicus International Law Scholars.
Tyler Giannini, Cambridge, MA, for the amicus U.S. Career Foreign Service Diplomats.
John B. Bellinger, III, Gregory Katsas, Douglas N. Letter, Robert M. Loeb, Sharon Swingle, and Debra Wong Yang, for the amicus The United States.
ORDER
In light of the intervening authority of Sarei v. Rio Tinto, 550 F.3d 822 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc), this case is remanded to the district court to consider whether a prudential exhaustion requirement applies in this case, and if so, whether that requirement bars any claims in this case. On remand, the district court should also consider the effect, if any, of the decision of the Council of State of the Republic of Colombia in Mario Galvis Gelves, et al. v. The Nation, slip op. (Council of State, Rep. of Colombia, Ad. Law Div., Sec. 3, Dec. 13, 2007) and the decision of the Court No. 12 for Criminal Matters of the Circuit of Bogot of the Republic of Colombia in In re Cesare Romero Pradilla, et al., slip op. (Sept. 21, 2007).
REMANDED.