History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gallopin v. Winsor
234 A.D. 601
N.Y. App. Div.
1931
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

We consider that the government of Mexico is a necessary party in interest in the fund proposed to be impounded by this receivership order; and since it is a sovereign State and cannot be made a party without its consent, there was no jurisdiction to appoint receivers of its funds or to issue an injunction against the disposition thereof. We think the order was improvident and should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Finch, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Sherman, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Gallopin v. Winsor
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jul 15, 1931
Citation: 234 A.D. 601
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.