Gallo v. CookGallo v. Cook
— Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, with costs, and new trial granted. Memorandum: In this personal injury action, plaintiff Stella Gallo seeks money damages for injuries sustained as a result of a fall allegedly caused by the negligence of defendants. Her husband Joseph Gallo brings a derivative claim for the loss of her services and society. The jury awarded $20,000 to Stella Gallo on the personal injury action and found her 50% comparatively negligent. The jury denied any recovery to Joseph Gallo.
There can be no doubt on this record that plaintiff husband suffered some loss, and the absence of an award of damages on his derivative suit is contrary to a fair interpretation of the evidence and inconsistent with the award of money damages on his wife’s personal injury claim (see, Gray v Brooklyn Hgts. R. R. Co.,