History
  • No items yet
midpage
Galbreath v. Moore
2 Watts 86
Pa.
1833
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

We have already determined that in a single transaction such as this, there is not a partnership to require the remedy to be by account-render. The parties were joint owners of the bonds, as they would have been had the price paid for them been the original consideration and they the obligees. There were no accounts with third persons to be settled; and one of the joint owners might recover in assumpsit his proportion of the money paid to the other, as so much received to his use.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Galbreath v. Moore
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Sep 15, 1833
Citation: 2 Watts 86
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.