midpage

Galbreath v. MooreGalbreath v. Moore

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Sep 15, 1833
Reporters:
Per Curiam.

We have already determined that in a single ‍‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‍transaction such as this, there is not a partnership to require the remedy to be by account-render. The ‍‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‍parties were joint owners of the bonds, as they would have been had the price paid for ‍‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‍them been the original consideration and they the obligees. There were no accounts with third persons to ‍‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‍be settled; and one of the joint owners might recover in assumpsit his proportion of the money paid to the ‍‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‍other, as so much received to his use.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Galbreath v. Moore
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Sep 15, 1833
Citation: 2 Watts 86
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
Log In