History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gage v. Gannet
10 Mass. 176
Mass.
1813
Check Treatment
By the Court.

It does not appear, on the face of the record before us, that the county is directly interested. But the defendants have waived this exception, by appearing and pleading to the action in the court below. It is true that in Prince’s case there was also an appearance for the defendant; but there the defect of jurisdiction was apparent on the face of the record, (a)

Motion overruled.

[Vide Pearce vs. Atwood, 13 Mass. Rep. 324. — Commonwealth vs. Ryan, 5 Mass. Rep. 90. — Brown vs. Inhab. Somerset, 11 Mass. Rep. 221. — Boston vs. Tileston 11 Mass. Rep. 468. — Commonwealth vs. Worcester, 3 Pick. 464. — Ed.]

Case Details

Case Name: Gage v. Gannet
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Jun 15, 1813
Citation: 10 Mass. 176
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.