History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gagan v. Sharar
2:99-cv-01427
D. Ariz.
Apr 18, 2006
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 Case 2:99-cv-01427-DJH Document 291 Filed 04/18/06 Page 1 of 2 WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA James L. Gagan, )

)

Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor, )

) No. CIV 99-1427 PHX RCB ) vs. ) O R D E R )

Victor E. Sharer and James A. Monroe, et al., )

)

)

Defendants. )

)

In its order dated August 28, 2000, the Court appointed Dale D. Ulrich ("Ulrich") to act as receiver in this matter. Order (doc. 63). On February 11, 2006, Ulrich filed a Motion to Approve Accounting, Approve Fees and Discharge Assets Receiver in this case. Motion (doc. 283). In his motion, Ulrich moves the Court to approve his final accounting, approve and allow payment of the fees and costs incurred, and discharge the receiver. Id. at 1. Ulrich asserts that such actions are appropriate at this time, because the assets that he was "appointed to administer have been liquidated and/or no further recovery from those assets is expected." Id. at *2 Case 2:99-cv-01427-DJH Document 291 Filed 04/18/06 Page 2 of 2 2.

Plaintiff James L. Gagan ("Gagan") opposes Ulrich's motion and requests. Resp. (doc. 285). In his response, Gagan argues that the Court should order the funds garnished from the Judgment Debtor's accounts to be split between the parties to achieve a more equitable result. Id. at 1. Specifically, Gagan asserts that he was forced to pay a significant amount of money in the form of attorney's fees and costs in order to file the appropriate court documents to obtain the garnished funds. Id. at 2. Therefore, he argues that "it seems only fair that Gagan, at the least, [should] be able to surcharge the amount held by the Receiver for the cost of obtaining the garnished funds." Id. The Court disagrees. Plaintiff sought the receivership and there is no indication that the receiver acted in other than a responsible manner.

IT IS ORDERED that Ulrich's Motion to Approve Accounting, Approve Fees and Discharge Assets Receiver (doc. 283) is GRANTED. The submitted accounting is approved, the fees are granted, and the receiver is discharged. Ulrich is directed to pro rate the $14,860.39 on hand between himself, as the receiver, and his counsel, based on their respective statements. Gagan shall not receive any part of the contested funds.

DATED this 18 th day of April, 2006.

Copies to counsel of record

- 2 -

Case Details

Case Name: Gagan v. Sharar
Court Name: District Court, D. Arizona
Date Published: Apr 18, 2006
Docket Number: 2:99-cv-01427
Court Abbreviation: D. Ariz.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.