79 Mich. 260 | Mich. | 1890
Gadsby sued Stimer before a justice, D. G. Palmer, of Jackson county. The summons was dated November 13, 2880, directed to any constable of
“1 hereby appoint Jotham Bryant to serve the within summons. D. G-. Palmer, Justice of the Peace.”
No showing appears in the justice’s proceedings to support the appointment of Bryant, as to age or lack of interest; and it does not appear from the indorsement, or otherwise, that he was appointed on plaintiff’s request. Defendant appeared specially, and objected to the jurisdiction for want of authority in Bryant. The objection was overruled, and judgment rendered for plaintiff. Defendant appealed specially, setting up Bryant’s want of authority. The justice made a return which, so far as this point is concerned, showed nothing more than the summons and indorsement, and gave no explanation of the appointment. The circuit court overruled the jurisdictional question, and the case comes up on error.
Section 7074, How. Stat., has been under consideration heretofore in Rasch v. Moore, 57 Mich. 54 (23 N. W. Rep. 456), and Union Mut. Fire Insurance Co. v. Page, 61 Id. 72 (27 N. W. Rep. 859). It provides that a justice,—
^Whenever he shall judge it expedient, on the request of a party, may, by written authority indorsed on such process, empower any proper person, being of lawful age, and not a party or interested in the suit, to execute the same.”
The power given is not general, but limited and conditional, requiring—
1. The request of a party.
2. The fitness of the person designated.
It was pointed out in those cases that the power for mischief which may come from a false return makes it necessary to use care in selecting a proper person, who will be responsible. The requirement of a request from the party is also essential, so as to create a personal
The judgment of the circuit court must be reversed, and judgment rendered of dismissal for defendant, with costs of all the courts.