History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gabe Kaimowitz, Esquire, Qui Tam, Usa, Ex Rel. v. Orlando, Florida, Rick Bernhardt, Orlando Neighborhood Improvement Corporation, ("Onic")
131 F.3d 950
11th Cir.
1997
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM:

No member of this panel nor other judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the court be polled on Rehearing En Banc (Rule 35, Fed.R.App.P.; Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5), the Suggestion of Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

On panel rehearing, the- last two sentences (including footnote 7) of the opinion are hereby deleted, and the following sentence is substituted in lieu thereof:

For the reason discussed above, the record conclusively established that Kairnowitz was not entitled in this suit to the unrelated preliminary injunction he sought, and thus it was clear that an evidentiary hearing was not necessary.

The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED in all respects except for the foregoing-amendment of the opinion.

Case Details

Case Name: Gabe Kaimowitz, Esquire, Qui Tam, Usa, Ex Rel. v. Orlando, Florida, Rick Bernhardt, Orlando Neighborhood Improvement Corporation, ("Onic")
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date Published: Nov 20, 1997
Citation: 131 F.3d 950
Docket Number: 96-2307
Court Abbreviation: 11th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In