History
  • No items yet
midpage
Futrell v. . Deanes
116 N.C. 38
N.C.
1895
Check Treatment

It appears from the record that the only question was, which party should pay the costs. Such questions are not considered in this Court. S.v. R. R., 74 N.C. 287; Hasty v. Funderburk, 89 N.C. 93.

Appeal dismissed.

Cited: Elliott v. Tyson, post, 184; Monroe v. Angel, post, 847; Elliottv. Tyson, 117 N.C. 115; Herring v. Pugh, 125 N.C. 438; Van Dyke v. Ins.Co., 174 N.C. 81.

Case Details

Case Name: Futrell v. . Deanes
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Feb 5, 1895
Citation: 116 N.C. 38
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.