midpage

Fussell v. DanielsFussell v. Daniels

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 17, 1934
No. 10065
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Beck
Beck, P. J.

1. The court did not err in overruling the ‍‌​​‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‍general demurrer to the petition. Civil Code, § 3016; Crawford v. Wilson, 139 Ga. 654 (78 S. E. 30, 44 L. R. A. (N. S.) 773) ; Richardson v. Cade, 150 Ga. 535 (104 ‍‌​​‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‍S. E. 207); Ansley v. Ansley, 154 Ga. 357 (114 S. E. 182); Fay v. Burton, 147 Ga. 648 (95 S. E. 222); Heery v. Heery, 144 Ga. 467 (87 S. E. 472); Eagon v. Conway, 115 Ga. 130 (41 S. E. 493); Belt v. Lazenby, 126 Ga. 767 (56 S. ‍‌​​‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‍E. 81).

2. The special grounds of demurrer, so far as meritorious, were met by amendment. While other grounds may have ‍‌​​‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‍pointed out defects in the pleadings, they were not of such materiality as to make it reversible error to overrule them. Judgment ‍‌​​‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‍affirmed.

All the Justices concur. E. L. Grantham and Kelley & Dickerson, for plaintiffs in error. McDonald & Gilson, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Fussell v. Daniels
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Sep 17, 1934
Citations: 179 Ga. 462; 176 S.E. 369; 1934 Ga. LEXIS 309; No. 10065
Docket Number: No. 10065
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
Log In