midpage

Fussell v. DanielsFussell v. Daniels

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 17, 1934
No. 10065
Versions:179 Ga. 462
176 S.E. 369
1934 Ga. LEXIS 309
Beck, P. J.

1. The court did not err in overruling the general demurrer to the petition. Civil Code, § 3016; Crawford v. Wilson, 139 Ga. 654 (78 S. E. 30, 44 L. R. A. (N. S.) 773) ; Richardson v. Cade, 150 Ga. 535 (104 S. E. 207); Ansley v. Ansley, 154 Ga. 357 (114 S. E. 182); Fay v. Burton, 147 Ga. 648 (95 S. E. 222); Heery v. Heery, 144 Ga. 467 (87 S. E. 472); Eagon v. Conway, 115 Ga. 130 (41 S. E. 493); Belt v. Lazenby, 126 Ga. 767 (56 S. E. 81).

2. The special grounds of demurrer, so far as meritorious, were met by amendment. While other grounds may have pointed out defects in the pleadings, they were not of such materiality as to make it reversible error to overrule them. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. E. L. Grantham and Kelley & Dickerson, for plaintiffs in error. McDonald & Gilson, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Fussell v. Daniels
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Sep 17, 1934
Citations: 179 Ga. 462; 176 S.E. 369; 1934 Ga. LEXIS 309; No. 10065
Docket Number: No. 10065
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
Log In