History
  • No items yet
midpage
Furlong v. Coleman
3 Cranch 178
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1827
Check Treatment
THE COURT (THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, absent)

said, that the rule being laid at the last term in open court, and not objected to, at that time, the burden of proof was now on the plaintiff to show that he was a resident of the county at that time. That the plaintiff, and his counsel were bound to take notice of all the orders made by the court in the cause.

Case Details

Case Name: Furlong v. Coleman
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
Date Published: Nov 15, 1827
Citation: 3 Cranch 178
Docket Number: Case No. 5,161
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.