History
  • No items yet
midpage
Furey v. Salaam
528, 2024
| Del. | Oct 31, 2025
|
Check Treatment

*1 Before SEITZ , Chief Justice; LEGROW and GRIFFITHS , Justices.

ORDER

After considering the opening brief and the record below, we find it evident that the Court of Chancery’s judgment should be affirmed on the basis of the court’s December 2, 2024 order approving the Magistrate in Chancery’s final report dated November 8, 2024. The appellant did not file exceptions to the Magistrate’s report and therefore did not preserve any issues for review on appeal. [1] *2 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that judgment of the Court of Chancery is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT: /s/ N. Christopher Griffiths Justice

2

[1] See Cowan v. Furlow , 2024 WL 4362264, at *2 (Del. Sept. 30, 2024) (“This Court has long held that substantive challenges to a Magistrate’s final report that are not raised in exceptions under Court of Chancery Rule 144 are not preserved for review on appeal to this Court.”).

Case Details

Case Name: Furey v. Salaam
Court Name: Supreme Court of Delaware
Date Published: Oct 31, 2025
Docket Number: 528, 2024
Court Abbreviation: Del.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.