History
  • No items yet
midpage
Funk v. Swearingen
251 Pa. 229
Pa.
1915
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

And now, October 18, 1915, the five members of the court who duly considered this petition, to which an insufficient answer has been filed, are of one mind that the petitioner is entitled to the writ of mandamus for which he prays, and it is so ordered. The petition of the members of the bar of Fayette County, filed by permission of the court, has no proper place in the pleadings. Let the writ of mandamus go out at respondent’s costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Funk v. Swearingen
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 18, 1915
Citation: 251 Pa. 229
Docket Number: Miscellaneous Docket, No. 190
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.