Fuller v. Davis
63 Miss. 78 | Miss. | 1885
delivered the opinion of the court.
The assignee of the note was not the “ legal representative ” of the payees, so as to be entitled to substitute a trustee under a provision in a deed of trust authorizing the payees “ or their legal representatives ” to appoint another trustee. An assignee claims in his own right, and not in a representative character.
Afirmed.