32:T4c8,{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Legislation","name":"Fugazi v. Kelly, 1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 584","datePublished":"1922-01-20","legislationDate":"1922-01-20","citation":"Fugazi v. Kelly, 1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 584 (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)","countryOfOrigin":"USA","jurisdiction":"California Court of Appeal","description":"Read the full text of Fugazi v. Kelly (Fugazi v. Kelly, 1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 584 (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)). This legal opinion, filed in 1922-01-20, from the California Court of Appeal discusses important legal matters. Access this case and related legal documents on Midpage, an AI-powered legal research platform.","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/fugazi-v-kelly--3295668"},"author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"url":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/fugazi-v-kelly--3295668","isPartOf":{"@type":"WebSite","name":"Midpage","url":"https://app.midpage.ai"},"inLanguage":"en","keywords":"legal, opinion, document, research, midpage, Fugazi v. Kelly, California Court of Appeal, Fugazi v. Kelly, 1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 584 (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)","isAccessibleForFree":true,"isFamilyFriendly":true}34:T49d,

Defendant Slye appeals from a judgment foreclosing a mortgage securing payment of a note for $25,000. The complaint asked for judgment for $25,000, with accrued interest, counsel fees, and costs. The clerk of the court after trial made an entry in his minutes reciting that judgment had been ordered in the sum of $3107.37, with counsel fees and costs. A few days thereafter findings of fact and conclusions of law were filed with a decree awarding judgment in the sum of $31,447.24, with counsel fees and costs. Appellant insists that the trial court was bound by the minute entry made by the clerk.

[1] No bill of exceptions is presented, so the appeal must be deemed to be one on the judgment-roll alone. [2] The minute entry of judgment is no part of the judgment-roll. *Page 245 (Sec. 670, Code Civ. Proc.) In examining the judgment-roll we find no error.

The appeal is without merit, as the amount noted in the entry of the clerk was manifestly a mere clerical error.

Judgment affirmed.

Langdon, P. J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.