midpage

Frye v. TuckerFrye v. Tucker

Illinois Supreme Court
Apr 15, 1860
Reporters:
Before:
Breese
Breese, J.

That a railroad company can take a promissory note and negotiate it in ‍‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‍the ordinary course of their business, cannot be questioned. It is a power inherent in all such corporations. The assignment by the company, was prima facie ‍‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‍their act through their authorized officer. If it was not their act, it should have been denied by affidavit. McIntire v. Preston, 5 Gilm. 60.

The entry on the ‍‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‍docket of the justice of the peace identified the note, and was sufficient. But if it was not, it could make no difference, as on the appeal ‍‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‍the case is tried de novo in the Circuit Court, all formal objections of every kind being overlooked, the only inquiry being, had the justice of ‍‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‍the peace jurisdiction. Swingley v. Haynes, 22 Ill. R. 216.

The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Frye v. Tucker
Court Name: Illinois Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 15, 1860
Citation: 24 Ill. 180
Court Abbreviation: Ill.
Log In