Frye v. Commissioner of Correctional ServicesFrye v. Commissioner of Correctional Services
We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the positive urinalysis test results and related documentation, as well as the hearing testimony, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Allred v Goord, 48 AD3d 847, 848 [2008]; Matter of Marino v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 41 AD3d 1004, 1005 [2007], appeal dismissed and lv denied 9 NY3d 940 [2007]). We reject petitioner‘s contention that he was denied a fair hearing due to the fact that the correction officer who actually tested petitioner‘s urine
Cardona, P.J., Spain, Rose, Malone Jr. and Garry, JJ., concur.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.