History
  • No items yet
midpage
Frustere v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
3:11-cv-06395
N.D. Cal.
Jul 13, 2012
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 Case 3:11-cv-06395-MMC Document 37 Filed 07/13/12 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RICHARD A. FRUSTERE, No. C 11-6395 MMC Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., BRENDAN MURPHY, individually and as trustee of the MURPHY FAMILY TRUST, and DOES 1 TO 100, Defendants. /

Before the Court is defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s (“Wells Fargo”) Motion to Dismiss, filed May 23, 2012. Plaintiff Richard Frustere (“Frustere”) has filed opposition, to which defendant has replied. The matter came on regularly for hearing July 13, 2012. Jason M. Richardson appeared on behalf of Wells Fargo. Mary Catherine Wiederhold appeared on behalf of Frustere.

Having read and considered the parties’ respective written submissions, and for the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, the Court hereby GRANTED, as follows:

1. Plaintiff’s Second Cause of Action (“Intentional Misrepresentation”) is dismissed with leave to amend.

2. Plaintiff’s Eighth Cause of Action (“Negligence”) is dismissed without leave to amend.

*2 Case 3:11-cv-06395-MMC Document 37 Filed 07/13/12 Page 2 of 2 3. Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint, if any, shall be filed no later than August 17, 2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 13, 2012 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 2

Case Details

Case Name: Frustere v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Court Name: District Court, N.D. California
Date Published: Jul 13, 2012
Docket Number: 3:11-cv-06395
Court Abbreviation: N.D. Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.