Frumenti v. StateFrumenti v. State
Frederick Frumenti appeals an order summarily denying his Rule 3.800(a) motion.1 We affirm.
Frumenti was sentenced for armed burglary of a dwelling,2 possession of a firearm by a convicted felon,3 grand theft of a
Nothing in Apprendi overrules the Florida Supreme Court‘s holding in Eutsey v. State, 383 So.2d 219 (Fla.1980) that the determination that a defendant could be sentenced as an habitual felony offender was independent of the question of guilt in the underlying substantive offense and did not require the full panoply of rights afforded a defendant in the trial of the offense.
AFFIRMED.
PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur.