26 Conn. App. 185 | Conn. App. Ct. | 1991
The plaintiff appeals to this court from the trial court’s dismissal of his administrative appeal
After our plenary analysis of the record, transcripts and briefs submitted with this appeal, and after affording the plaintiff’s claims the appropriate scope of review, we determine that the factual findings of the trial court are not clearly erroneous and that its decision conforms to the applicable law.
The trial court filed a complete, legally sound memorandum of decision incorporating the facts and setting forth legal conclusions made in conformity with applicable law.
Accordingly, the trial court’s memorandum of decision, reported in Fromer v. Boyer-Napert Partnership,
The judgment is affirmed.
The trial court cites Fee v. Carothers, 23 Conn. App. 435, 580 A.2d 1244 (1990), for the proposition that the statute in effect at the time that an appeal from an administrative ruling is commenced controls the action. We note, however, that Vernon Village, Inc. v. Carothers, 217 Conn. 130, 585 A.2d 76 (1991), which was decided after the trial court’s decision in this case, established that the statute in effect at the time that the administrative proceedings are commenced controls the action.