History
  • No items yet
midpage
Friedman v. State
161 Misc. 358
New York Court of Claims
1936
Check Treatment
Greenberg, J.

This is a motion made by claimant for an examination of witnesses before trial, and for an order permitting claimant to inspect and discover records and to make extracts therefrom, and to examine witnesses with respect thereto, and to inspect and discover and photograph the premises where the accident is alleged to have occurred.

There is no statutory authority for the examination, inspection or discovery sought by the claimant. The Court of Claims Act and Rules of the Court of Claims make no provision for such examination or discovery. The fact that plaintiff is a representative of a deceased, and brings this action in a representative capacity, does not afford him further or additional rights. (Falco v. N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R. Co., 161 App. Div. 735, 738.) While the examination sought herein is of “ witnesses,” it is my opinion that the result would be the same as the examination of the State as a party; the examination would be of officers and employees of the State. (Cooper v. Village of Brockport, 246 App. Div. 571.)

Upon the authority of the case of Bush Terminal Co. v. City of New York (259 N. Y. 509), and the recent decision of the Court of Claims in Langdon v. State of New York (160 Misc. 946), the motion herein must be denied. Submit order accordingly.

Barrett, P. J., concurs.

Case Details

Case Name: Friedman v. State
Court Name: New York Court of Claims
Date Published: Dec 16, 1936
Citation: 161 Misc. 358
Docket Number: Claim No. 24483
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.