History
  • No items yet
midpage
Friedman v. Solinger
252 A.D. 731
N.Y. App. Div.
1937
Check Treatment

While the claim involved is of doubtful merit, the defense of the Statute of Limitations cannot be sustained on motion as there is conflict of fact as to when the demand for the return of the money was made. Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Friedman v. Solinger
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 15, 1937
Citation: 252 A.D. 731
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.