Fridmann-Harkiewicz v. HarkiewiczFridmann-Harkiewicz v. Harkiewicz
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment of divorce that, insofar as appealed from, distributed the marital assets and ordered him to pay maintenance and child support to plaintiff. We note at the outset that, while Supreme Court properly considered the appreciation in the value of the marital residence, the court made a mathematical error when it calculated the value of the distributive award. Plaintiff‘s distributive award should have been $8,320, not $8,350, and we therefore modify the judgment accordingly. In addition, we agree with defendant that the IRAs are defendant‘s separate property and should be distributed to him accordingly (see Hoadley v Hoadley, 212 AD2d 1036, 1036-1037 [1995]). We therefore further modify the judgment accordingly. We reject defendant‘s contention concerning child support and maintenance. Finally, although defendant is correct that the court failed to include the required notice pursuant to
Present —Scudder, P.J., Fahey, Peradotto, Valentino and DeJoseph, JJ.